- Google Bard is limited to US English; ChatGPT supports 26 languages.
- ChatGPT is accessible in 162 countries; Google Bard is available only in the US and UK.
- The average user session duration: ChatGPT – 8.44 minutes, Google Bard – 3.19 minutes.
- Incremental cost per query: Google Bard – $0.003 to $0.028, ChatGPT – $0.0036.
- ChatGPT’s pre-training data cut-off is 2021; Google Bard’s is 2019.
- ChatGPT utilizes 570 GB for pre-training data; Google Bard uses 750 GB.
“Google Bard VS ChatGPT Statistics” presents an in-depth analysis of two prominent AI language models. Launched on 21st March 2023, Google Bard is Alphabet’s contribution to the AI landscape, while ChatGPT was released on 30th November 2022 and originates from OpenAI. Each brings their unique strengths to the table. This blog post dissects the differences and similarities between these AI chatbots, guiding you better to understand their roles in the ever-evolving world of technology.
Google Bard vs ChatGPT : Summary
In this section, we will compare the key features of Google Bard and ChatGPT.
Feature | Google Bard | ChatGPT |
Language Support | US English | 26 Languages |
Availability | US and UK | 162 Countries |
Avg. User Session Duration | 3.19 minutes | 8.44 minutes |
Pre-training Data Cut-off | 2019 | 2021 |
Incremental Cost per Query | $0.003 to $0.028 | $0.0036 |
Subscription Plans | Free | Free & Plus ($20/mo) |
Google Bard VS ChatGPT: Usage
Feature | Google Bard | ChatGPT |
Language Support | US English | 26 Languages |
User Distribution | Predominantly US-based | Predominantly US-based |
Availability | US and UK | 162 Countries |
Average User Session Duration | 3.19 minutes | 8.44 minutes |
Language Support
ChatGPT supports around 26 languages, offering users a wider range of communication options. Google Bard, on the other hand, is limited to US English. This makes ChatGPT a more versatile option for users who require support in multiple languages.
User Distribution
Most users for both Google Bard and ChatGPT are from the US, 62.6% and 15%, respectively.
Availability
ChatGPT is accessible in 162 countries, while Google Bard is officially available only in the US and the UK.
User Engagement
The average user session duration on ChatGPT is 8.44 minutes, while it is 3.19 minutes on Google Bard. This indicates that users tend to engage with ChatGPT for longer, suggesting higher user satisfaction.
Google Bard VS ChatGPT: Technicals
In this section, we will compare the technical aspects of Google Bard and ChatGPT, including their neural network architecture and pre-training data.
Feature | ChatGPT | Google Bard |
Architecture | GPT 3.5 | LaMDA |
Training Data Size | 300 billion words | 1.56 trillion words |
Parameters | 175 billion | 137 billion |
Pre-training Data Cut-off | 2021 | 2019 |
Data Storage Size | 570 GB | 750 GB |
Neural Network Architecture
ChatGPT and Google Bard run on the same neural network architecture called Transformer. However, there are differences in the training data size and parameters. ChatGPT, currently running on GPT 3.5, is trained on 300 billion words and 175 billion parameters. Google Bard runs on LaMDA, which was trained on Infiniset dataset consisting of 1.56 trillion words and 137 billion parameters. GPT-4 is expected to have more parameters than GPT 3.5.
Pre-training Data
Comparison of Pre-training Data Cut-off
ChatGPT has a pre-training data cut-off of 2021, while Google Bard’s cut-off is 2019. Although Google Bard has Internet access, ChatGPT does not. Bard can thus provide real-time information to users. ChatGPT’s pre-training data is stored in 570 GB, while Google Bard’s pre-training data occupies 750 GB.
Pre-training Data Composition
GPT-3 training data
Dataset | # Tokens | Proportion within training |
Common Crawl | 410 billion | 60% |
WebText2 | 19 billion | 22% |
Books 1 | 12 billion | 8% |
Books2 | 55 billion | 8% |
Wikipedia | 3 billion | 3% |
Source: Wikipedia
Infiniset composition:
Component | Percentage |
C4-based data | 12.5% |
English language Wikipedia | 12.5% |
Code documents (Q&A, tutorials, etc.) | 12.5% |
English web documents | 6.25% |
Non-English web documents | 6.25% |
Dialogs data from public forums | 50% |
Google Bard VS ChatGPT: Financials
In this section, we will analyze the financial aspects of Google Bard and ChatGPT, including cost analysis and subscription plans
Feature | ChatGPT | Google Bard |
Incremental Cost per Query | $0.0036 | $0.003 to $0.028 |
Base Search Cost per Query | N/A | ~$0.003 |
Subscription Plan | Free & Plus ($20/mo) | Free |
Advanced Models Access | GPT 3.5 Turbo & GPT-4 | N/A |
Cost Analysis
Analysts at UBS estimated that for every search query Google triggers its AI chatbot Bard, Alphabet will incur $0.003 to $0.028 in incremental costs on top of its base search cost of ~$0.003 per query, as of Mar 2023. A report, published by SemiAnalysis on 17 Feb 2023, suggests that OpenAI bears $0.0036 in costs for each query made in ChatGPT.
Subscription Plans
ChatGPT and Bard are free for users. However, ChatGPT offers a Plus subscription that costs $20 per month, in which users get access to advanced models like GPT 3.5 Turbo and GPT-4, and other benefits. Currently, there is no paid subscription available for Google Bard.
Conclusion
This April 2023 comparison of Google Bard and ChatGPT highlights key differences between the two AI chatbots. While ChatGPT offers more extensive language support and more prolonged user engagement, Google Bard delivers real-time information with an impressive training data size. Please share your thoughts and experiences with Google Bard and ChatGPT in the comments below.